The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Taiwan's elections and the cross-Strait relations

February 11 ,2016

Democratic Progressive Party chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen [Chinanews.com]



Taiwan's leadership and legislative elections ended on January 16 with the ruling Kuomintang (KMT) losing the former by three million votes to the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in the former and being almost trounced in the latter.

Since 2008, the KMT had made obvious contributions to the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, but the election results show it needs to do more in the area of elective politics on the island, which is an issue commonly faced by Taiwan's political parties.

Why the KMT suffered such humiliating defeat has become a hot topic in academic and media circles. To regain its ruling status, the KMT needs to have a better understanding of public opinion and win the support of the majority of people. This defeat shows it has "lost the ardent support of the people".

Since it failed to fulfill promises made when taking office, the people have nursed many grievances and thus demanded a change in the status quo.

Take economic development for an example. Ma Ying-jeou put forward the so-called "633 Plan" which promised an overall economic growth rate of 6 percent, per capita GDP growth of 3 percent, and holding unemployment to 3 percent. None of these targets were achieved.

Statistics show that during Ma Ying-jeou's first term from 2008 to 2011, the economic growth rate in Taiwan averaged 3.39 percent. In his second term, the figure fell to about 2.31 percent. In 2015, the figure had fallen even more sharply to an estimated 1.06 percent from 4 percent in 2014.

In 2011 before Ma Ying-jeou ended his first term, Taiwan's per capita GDP stood at US$21,000 compared to US$17,596 in 2007. However, by 2013 the figure had dropped to US$20,930, the lowest among the "Asia's Four Little Dragons" - Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. The current overall unemployment rate in Taiwan is 4 percent, while the rate among young workers is surprisingly high to about 12 percent, a large number holding masters and doctoral degrees.

Not surprisingly, Ma Ying-jeou's support rate had continuously declined, with the figure standing at only 9 percent in 2013. Local media published articles saying he should assume responsibility.

KMT's incapability to handle economic affairs over the past eight years has highlighted the problems related to the people's livelihood and certainly aggravated their discontents. The people's demand for a change in political power helped Tsai Ing-wen win the election to a certain extent. The economic factor was confirmed in post-election opinion polls. The issue of cross-Strait relations was little mentioned.

However, cross-Strait peace remains an important factor in Taiwan's political election. How to create a peace dividend for the people on the island is an issue of common concerned to both the KMT and the DPP. The people should get tangible benefits in the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, in terms of improvement of the people's livelihood, disposable income, employment rate and happiness index.

During Ma Ying-jeou's first term, Taiwan and the mainland signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). Over the past eight years, more agreements have been reached through the efforts of the Taiwan-based Straits Exchange Foundation and the Beijing-based Association for Relations across the Taiwan Straits.

However, Ma Ying-jeou has failed to promote these agreements and getting the "lift" of mainland development to help the island's people enjoy the dividends.

The people of Taiwan certainly hope to see peaceful cross-Strait relations, even though they have little interest in politics. How to promote the development of Taiwan's economy, contain the increasingly marginalized situation of Taiwan's economic status, and enable the people to enjoy the peaceful development dividends are the problems faced by the Taiwan leaders after the election.

The DPP becomes Taiwan's ruling party for the second time. The party's "Taiwan independence" program and Tsai Ing-wen's evasive talk in regard to cross-Strait relations triggered speculation of some "extraordinary move". However, if Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP want a second term in 2020, they must first deal well with issues of the island's economic development and the people's livelihood, both of which depend on the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations.

Therefore, maintaining the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations and enabling the people to enjoy material dividends brought about by the peaceful development should be the keynote approach of Tsai Ing-wen and her party. They need to think rationally and find a balanced view of future work.

The author is a researcher of the Charhar Institute and the Guangxi University for Nationalities.

This article was translated by Li Jingrong based on the original unabridged version published in Chinese.

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2023 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use