The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

The China-Canada Online Forum was Successfully Held

January 25, 2021

Canadian Ambassador to China Dominic Barton visited the Charhar Institute

November 26, 2020

More Chinese relief materials sent to South Korea

March 06, 2020

Chinese NGO donates epidemic prevention materials to S. Korea

March 05, 2020

Han Fangming gives a send-off to Nepalese Ambassador Leela Mani Paudyal

March 05, 2020

Singapore’s new ambassador Lui Tuck Yew visits The Charhar Institute

January 16, 2020
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Impact of ‘Trumpism’ on US constitutionalism, democracy dies hard

January 13, 2021

How will Biden confront Trump's foreign policy legacy?

January 13, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

Morrison's misjudgment on China-Australia relations

December 11, 2020

Travesty to tarnish normal defense moves as wolf warrior diplomacy

December 10, 2020
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Morrison's misjudgment on China-Australia relations

December 11 ,2020

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison. /AP

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's government is looking to escalate its confrontational stance on China, backed by U.S. and UK officials. On December 3, the Australian parliament approved a bill to give the federal government final say on agreements reached between a state government and a foreign country. Under the new law, a 2018 deal on China's "Belt and Road Initiative" signed by the state of Victoria could be blocked by Canberra. If that happens, China-Australia relations will be further strained.

To Beijing, Canberra's displays of near "psychotic" tendency are increasingly bewildering. Although Morrison is reluctant to join the U.S. in its confrontation against China, he can't seem to resist acting confrontational toward the country.

The Australian side was upset by a tweet from a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson. Even so, the prime minister's response was unnecessary when it could have come from an official of an appropriate level. 


A screenshot of Zhao Lijian's Twitter post. /@zlj517

The image tweeted by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian was not false information about the Australian military. The atrocities committed against Afghan civilians and children by some Australian soldiers are unforgivable and must be condemned and answered for.

In fact, these crimes are only a small part of the West's military violence in Afghanistan. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has launched an investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan by foreign armies, including the U.S. army, despite ICC officials being threatened with reprisals from the Trump administration.

Canberra needs to reconsider its China policy. In 2018, Australia became the first country to ban Huawei from the construction of 5G networks. Frictions between the two countries have since worsened. In China's view, Australia is playing vanguard for Trump's America in applying maximum pressure on China, even if it means severe damage to the country's own interests.

At the end of the day, Morrison's government lacks respect for China deep down, but it is also incapable of coming up with a China policy independent of U.S. pressure. As a remotely located country, Australia is fearful of being abandoned by a major country – first Britain, and now the U.S. But it is facing a dilemma handling its relationships with China and with the U.S. at the same time. By going overboard on issues like the South China Sea, Hong Kong, Xinjiang and COVID-19, Morrison's government hoped to appease the Trump administration and thereby secure U.S. support. But it will be a misjudgment to think that its reckless sabotage of China-Australia relations is without consequences.

To quote a Chinese diplomat: If Canberra treats China like an enemy, it will be an enemy. Economic and trade ties have in recent years brought the countries closer, but Morrison's government is acting like it sees China as no more than a money tool.


China is Australia's biggest trading partner. /Reuters

China recently hit Australian imports with trade measures, affecting products including barley, beef, coal, seafood and wines. This has been taken as retaliatory by Canberra, despite the Chinese side's denial of political and diplomatic connections. As a matter of fact, Australia has launched hundreds of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy probes against Chinese products, whereas China has less than 10 such investigations relating to Australia. The choices of countries which China can import from is many, and its market is huge with abundant business opportunities.

In his recent speech to British think tank Policy Exchange, Morrison acknowledged there are "undeniable tensions" in the Australia-China relationship, many of which are based on "some misunderstandings." He said from the Australian perspective, the end result was not to contain China, but "happy coexistence, respecting each other's sovereignty and systems." Morrison also said that when it came to bilateral relationships with China, his country's actions have been viewed through the lens of U.S.-China strategic competition. "It's as if Australia does not have its own unique interests or views as an independent sovereign state. This is false and needlessly deteriorates relationships," he said, stressing that Australia is not, and has never been, in the economic containment camp on China.

Most Chinese strategists believe the softening of tone in Morrison's speech was due to concerns over a possible thaw in U.S.-China relations after Joe Biden assumes office, which will probably leave Australia in an awkward position. Former Australian Foreign Minister Gareth Evans had a few wise words for Morrison's government: Stop "digging holes," moderate the official language, make independent judgements, accept China's rise and seek multilateral cooperation. With its economic dependency on China, the Australian government has no choice but to get along with it, while taking the middle road between hostility and flattery.



Source: CGTN, 2020-12-07

Author

ZHAO Minghao

Adjunct Senior Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2021 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use