The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Rivalry must not dominate B3W

December 27 ,2021


Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, European Council President Charles Michel, US President Joe Biden, Japan's Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Italy's Prime Minister Mario Draghi, French President Emmanuel Macron, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor Angela Merkel pose for a group photo at the G7 summit, in Carbis Bay, Britain, June 11, 2021. /Agencies


Editor's note:  He Wenping is a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Science's Institute of West-Asian and African Studies and a senior research fellow at the Charhar Institute. The View don't necessarily represent those of China Daily nor Charhar Institute. 


At their summit in June, the G7 leaders endorsed US President Joe Biden's global infrastructure initiative, "Build Back Better World Framework" and agreed to form a partnership led by "major democracies" to help narrow the $40 trillion infrastructure need in the developing world, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Any move to help developing countries is welcome. But the US message also said Build Back Better World (B3W) is an alternative to the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative, and will compete with it in fields such as technology and the economy.

Although the US has claimed Build Back Better will be better than the Belt and Road Initiative, as it will have values-driven, high-standard and transparent infrastructure partnerships, it is important to reiterate that the Belt and Road Initiative is intended to be a bridge for co-development across the world, not a strategy for competition and dismantling other ongoing inclusive cooperation mechanisms and efforts.

The Belt and Road Initiative is based on humanity and has a vision for common development. The initiative is inclusive in nature and doesn't lay stress on ideology, because its aim is to promote cooperation between countries with different political systems by improving connectivity and developing closer economic ties, not only in Eurasia but also in the rest of the world, so that countries can jointly achieve prosperity.

China has proposed the principle of "extensive consultation, joint construction and shared benefits" for the Belt and Road Initiative, and Belt and Road projects are based on equal consultation. In the eight years of the initiative's development, the participating countries have successfully implemented many projects and learned many lessons. And the initiative, which began as macroscopic infrastructure cooperation project, has become even more inclusive and innovative, while upgraded high-quality cooperation has turned it into an open, green, clean and digital cooperation project.

The Belt and Road Initiative reflects China's vision of helping build a community with a shared future for mankind, despite rising populism in some countries and efforts to decouple the Chinese and US economies. Countries across the world are still highly interdependent and their interests intertwined. And the Belt and Road projects are in line with the global trends and continue to seek the common ground of cooperation and communication in order to build a more integrated world.

The initiative has made remarkable achievements, and is especially focused on five areas: policy coordination, unimpeded trade, financial integration, connectivity, and people-to-people bonds. China has been making increasing efforts to build and/or improve roads, railways, airports, seaports, power plants and other infrastructure facilities. Its success can be seen in improved global connectivity and poverty alleviation.

So far China had signed 206 Belt and Road cooperation documents with 140 countries and 32 international organizations, while Chinese enterprises have invested $34 billion in the economic and trade cooperation zones in Belt and Road countries, paid more than $3 billion in taxes, and created over 330,000 jobs.

True, the Build Back Better Framework has an attractive blueprint, but it is ideologically biased and its goal is to form a clique of so-called democracies. And the values-driven, high-standard, transparent and rules-based infrastructure partnerships the Build Back Better Framework intends to build will be based on the standards and rules of the US and its G7 partners, not on universal rules and values. Not to mention that the Build Back Better's goal, as the US said, is to compete against China.

As such, Build Back Better is a tool to force other countries to take sides between Washington and Beijing rather than a plan to promote cooperation-oriented development. So it cannot meet the needs of developing countries.

Besides, Biden signed a $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan early this month, which was less than the $2.25 trillion infrastructure package he announced in March. The plan's budget shrunk not only due to the Democrat-Republican political rivalry but also because of the discord within the Democratic Party.

That the US has taken about a year to pass a domestic infrastructure plan should give people an idea about how long it will take for it to implement Build Back Better projects, especially when the other G7 countries and a lot of third-party recipients would be involved. Above all, what will be the respective contributions of the G7 countries to the Build Back Better funds?

Chinese enterprises are known for their infrastructure technology, fast and high-quality construction, and strict work discipline. In fact, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has praised China's infrastructure efficiency. Moreover, the inclusion of 10 more Chinese companies in the 2021 Fortune Global 500 took the total to 143, more than that of the US for the second year.

The Belt and Road projects have strived to build a better world through inclusive global cooperation based on equality and openness. The world still needs more roads and bridges to enable more countries to enjoy the benefits of global development, and China and the US can and should work together to build a better world despite their differences.




Author

HE Wenping

Adjunct Senior Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2022 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use