The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03 ,2022




Editor's note: Wang Jin is a research fellow at Charhar Institute and an associate professor at China's Northwest University. The article reflects the author's views and not necessarily those of CGTN.


The crisis between Russia and Ukraine has attracted global attention. Both countries have amassed troops along the border in the past weeks, increasing the fears of an imminent war between Russia and the West.

For Russia, a full-on war with Ukraine could lead to more challenges than benefits. Following the Ukraine crisis of 2014, Russia expanded its influence in Ukraine's eastern Luhansk and Donetsk cities, while securing its annexation of Crimea by military presence. 

However, any further possible military influence of Moscow in Ukraine faces challenges: Russia is not able to control or influence areas outside Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea due to the presence of strong Ukrainian military forces and local people's nationalist sentiments, while it is also threatened by more sanctions from Washington. After the 2014 crisis, Washington's sanctions on Russia have put economic pressure on the country. Washington has repeatedly warned in the past weeks that once a war erupts between Russia and Ukraine, more sanctions could be imposed on Moscow. Therefore, Russia's war with Ukraine seems to be too costly.

To maintain its presence in Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea, Moscow could help win over the concessions from both Ukraine and other European states. Although both Luhansk and Donetsk established their local authorities after 2014 and pledged to become part of Russia, Moscow never accepted the pleas. From Moscow's perspective, it is highly necessary to earn leverage over Ukraine at a cost it can bear. A full-on war means expanding occupation areas in Ukraine, which will be difficult for Russia to maintain. Instead, punishing and subduing Ukraine by setting up separatist forces in Eastern Ukraine seems more plausible. Against this backdrop, Moscow does not need and does not want to further provoke war against Ukraine.

In addition, launching a war against Ukraine could lead to Moscow's loss of strategic bargaining chips against NATO. Moscow wants to force the West to sit down and promise to secure Russia's strategic sphere in Eastern Europe to stop further eastward expansion of NATO. Since 1991, the gradual but consistent eastward expansion of NATO threatens Russia's national security and strategic interests, and Moscow hopes to force the West to engage seriously with Moscow to discuss European security by establishing a new mechanism. Although Ukraine could not be accepted into NATO given Kyiv's tensions with Moscow, Kremlin worries about the possibility of U.S. deployments of missile and other strategic weapons inside Ukraine. Therefore, for Moscow, the crisis with Ukraine could be maintained but not escalated to a total war, with an aim to help reach agreements with the West to suspend U.S. deployment of intermediate-range ballistic missiles in Europe and limiting military presence and exercises along Russia's borders.


As far as Ukraine is concerned, launching a war against Russia seems impossible as Kyiv's military forces are incapable of resisting the Russian military offensive. After its independence in the 1990s, Ukraine's military capabilities shrank significantly, and it is difficult for Kyiv to amass a large amount of army with enough capabilities to resist the offensive from Moscow. 

Although Ukraine has shown the world its desire and morale to resist possible attacks from Russia – and always seeks retaking of Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea – Kyiv understands that it is nearly impossible to realize the aims within the short term. To launch a war against Russia might lead to more battlefield and territorial losses for Ukraine.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine wants war. Ukraine has little hope to win a total war with Russia, while Russia's total war with Ukraine could push Kyiv further into the Western camp, which is against Moscow's strategic targets in Eastern Europe. To keep the "cold peace" along the frontline with each other and continue communication under assistance from France, Germany and even Turkey, are accepted by both Russia and Ukraine.

Given its leading role in NATO, Washington's promise of security to Russia and its serious talks over missile and military deployments in Russia's neighboring states are important to settle the crisis in Ukraine. A new form of Helsinki Accords that establish a firm basis for the security of all European states could lay the foundation for decades of peace in Europe, including Russia and Ukraine.

The tensions between Russia and Ukraine could be pacified only when Moscow reaches strategic agreements with the West, especially the United States. Neither Russia nor Ukraine wants war, and the key to peace is in the negotiation table between Moscow and Washington.


Author

WANG Jin

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2023 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use