The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Pan Deng : China's judicial service can safeguard smooth implementation of BRI

April 26 ,2019


With the further development of the "Belt and Road" Initiative (BRI), the scale of international investment and infrastructure construction between China and participating countries are continuously expanding. As a result, commercial and investment disputes have gradually increased. Properly handling and resolving these disputes is not only the premise and guarantee for the smooth implementation of the BRI, but also a challenge that must be addressed under its "rules-based" principle. 

The question is, how? Which country's law should apply in settling the dispute? As the initiator of the BRI, what efforts has China made?

In fact, China has always attached great importance to the role of domestic justice in serving and safeguarding the development of the BRI. In July 2015, the Supreme People's Court issued "Opinions on People's Court's Provision of Judicial Service and Safeguards for BRI." Based on the features of the BRI and China's practice in foreign commercial trial, and the best judicial concepts and practices worldwide, this document has made innovative provisions in terms of equal protection of the rights and interests of all parties, mutual judicial benefits, application of international treaties and practices, and judicial review in arbitration award concerning foreign interests.


VCG Photo

Among them, the most watched institutional innovation is the International Commercial Courts of the Supreme People's Court, which were established in Shenzhen and Xi'an in June 2018 respectively. For the first time in China, commercial courts have set up expert committees composed of Chinese and foreign legal experts who are proficient in international law and lex patriae and have rich practical experience. These experts can not only mediate controversy at the choice of the litigants, but also be entrusted by the court to provide advice on technical matters.

The judges of courts are able to work in both Chinese and English. In view of a large amount of English evidence in foreign-related commercial disputes, judges will directly use English to review the file, and the parties need not provide Chinese translations.

Another change worth mentioning is also reflected in the change of attitude towards the application of foreign laws.

In the civil and commercial cases, under the circumstances of no damage to national sovereignty, mandatory legal provisions and social public interests, it is a common practice to allow foreign laws to be applied to cases. Although China's 1986 General Principles of The Civil Law and 2011 Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations have both approved such practice, due to the limited means for the ascertainment of foreign law, and the serious disputes over the practice between the parties, the courts always shied away from it in the past and tried to replace foreign law with Chinese law.

China's Supreme People's Court has issued several documents and guiding case in recent years, requiring courts at all levels to fully respect the parties' right to choose to apply foreign laws for trial. At the same time, the parties, the central authorities of the other party, Chinese embassies and consulates abroad, and foreign embassies and consulates in China are allowed to provide foreign legal texts. 


The entrance of the Supreme People's Court in Beijing, China, November 30, 2018. /VCG Photo

Other means of legal text provision such as online review are also made available. The Supreme People's Court has also set up a Foreign law Ascertainment Center in the Comparative Law Institute at China University of Political Science and Law, where I work, to provide professional support to courts at all levels. Some universities and legal service institutions in China have also offered similar services to meet the personalized needs of the parties and various institutions.

In the past three years, I have participated as an expert in five trials under foreign laws, provided relevant legal texts, appeared in court for questioning by judges and parties, and participated in mediation led by judges. Although the parties concerned have fierce disputes over relevant legal facts, they still feel Chinese courts worthy of trust for allowing them to choose their familiar laws for trial.

None of these cases has been appealed, and there have even been cases in which the parties withdrew the lawsuit and reached a settlement. I personally feel that using the law chosen by the parties to conduct the trial is a good way to eliminate the misunderstanding of China's judicial system by Chinese and foreign parties in various countries along the Belt and Road, and also serves as the most convincing stories in demonstrating the law-based business environment under BRI.

With the development of the BRI, Chinese and foreign market players are increasingly concerned about judicial issues, and China's judicial service and safeguard for BRI will also be improved. China has the ability to undertake more international obligations and provide more public goods in related fields of the BRI, and also has the ability to provide precedence and guidance for the settlement of commercial disputes.


Copy Editor/Xu Kunyang

Editor/Kang Sijun



Author: Pan Deng is an adjunct fellow of the Charhar Institute and an assistant professor at the China University of Political Science and Law. 
Source: CGTN, 2019-04-24
Original Link : https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d514d324d6a4d34457a6333566d54/index.html

Author

PAN Deng

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2022 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use