The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Should China reembrace North Korea?

June 22 ,2018

Seoul's decision to deploy the THAAD system has harmed Chinese-South Korean relations significantly, prompting multiple warnings and countermeasures from Beijing. Compared with voices in the government, the Chinese public has expressed drastic opinions, calling for the punishment of South Korea.

Among the proposed punishments, one suggests that China reconsider its ties with North Korea, adjust its Korean Peninsula policies and provide military aid to North Korean if necessary.

But whatever it ends up doing, Beijing should never consider developing closer ties with Pyongyang so as to once again become North Korea's protector. In particular, Beijing cannot back down on its stance against the North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

In so doing, China would not only cause South Korea to side entirely with the United States, but also would find itself allied with North Korea, a situation that would amount to a new Cold War. In the long run, the standoff would be extremely detrimental to China's development and strategic security.

Seoul's agreement to deploy THAAD didn't come abruptly. Park Geun-hye had long considered it, and the final decision must have been the result of the pressure from the United States. At the same time, Beijing's failure to contain North Korea's nuclear program may be another important reason.

Beijing believes that it spared no effort in solving the North Korean nuclear issue, but South Korea, along with some Western countries, thinks otherwise. In Seoul's opinion, Beijing has the power to force changes in North Korea but has been unwilling to make it happen; Seoul therefore thinks that Beijing has been assisting Pyongyang, or has at least been unwilling to impose sanctions.

But Beijing has its own difficulties, too. For Beijing, which is poised to punish South Korea, there are more important questions to think over: What is China's fundamental interest on the Korean Peninsula? How could it maximize this interest? In the competition between the two Koreas, which side will eventually prevail? If China cannot find answers to these questions, China's North Korea policies and Korean Peninsula strategies will go astray.

Any reasonable person can tell South Korea will be the one that prevails in the end. If the Beijing-Seoul ties deteriorate, the latter will consider Beijing as a stumbling block for the reunification on the Korean Peninsula. The new country built after reunification will be hostile to China.

Given the balance of power between China and South Korea, Beijing could well ignore this potential hostility. But one has to note that the reunified peninsula doesn't simply mean an expanded South Korea, but a stronger nation backed by the United States and Japan. Even though China could win if a contention starts, such a struggle would consume much national power, thus affecting China's rise.

Therefore, China's fundamental interest in the Korean Peninsula is to prevent a hostile government once the two Koreas reunify. To ensure that, China mustn't develop close ties with North Korea.

For its own fundamental interests, Beijing shouldn't adjust its Korean Peninsula strategies, let alone provide military aid to North Korea. Despite Seoul's decision for THAAD deployment, it doesn't necessarily mean Seoul has completely turned to Washington. But if China reembraces North Korea, then Seoul will readily become a U.S. protégé.

  Deng Yuwen is a fellow with the Charhar Institute.  

  The article was translated by Chen Boyuan. Its   original version     was published in Chinese.  



Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2023 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use