The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

The unbridgeable divisions between the Afghan Taliban and ISIS-K

September 09 ,2021

                                                                 

   

A Taliban fighter is seen holding the movement's flag after the U.S. military withdrawal, at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 31, 2021. /Getty


Though the Afghan Taliban seized the capital city Kabul and have become the dominant power in after the U.S. military withdrawal since last month, they are still resisted by two major forces, of which one is the local military forces in Panjshir fighting against the Taliban under the banner of both Ahmad Massoud and former Vice President of the Afghan government Amrullah Saleh, and the other is ISIS-K, or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Lvant-Khorasan Province, which challenges the Taliban over their dominance of the state.


Although the two powers, local forces in Panjshir and ISIS-K in Nangarhar, both reject the authority of the Afghan Taliban, the differences between these two powers are salient.


The Panjshir is the center for many former government supporters and military forces, while the conflict between these forces and the Afghan Taliban might be settled peacefully in the future through political dialogue and negotiation.


However, the division between ISIS-K and the Afghan Taliban is so antagonistic that it is impossible to be bridged. The terrorist attacks against U.S. forces and civilians at Kabul International Airport not only tried to humiliate the U.S., but also aimed to challenge the authority of the Taliban.


First, the legal foundations of the Afghan Taliban and ISIS-K are competing. Although both of them hope to construct Afghanistan into a state with the Sharia law as its fundamental principle, the legal status of the two groups are different. The Taliban bases it legitimacy on the Islamic Emirate, which should be led by the Islamic religious power in Afghanistan. ISIS-K bases its legitimacy on its allegations to the ISIS leadership, and perceives itself as a local branch of the "Caliphate," or the self-appointed highest Islamic leader of all Muslims in the world. Therefore, the Taliban and ISIS-K both reject each other's legitimacy, and highlight their own one as unchallenged in Afghanistan.


   

Women displaced by ISIS-K bake naan at their current home in Surkh Rod District, Afghanistan, July 14, 2017. /Getty


Second, members of the two groups are hostile. Though many members of ISIS-K also joined the Afghan Taliban, there were intense conflicts between the two groups in southern and eastern Afghanistan, which increased their hatred for each other. After their seizure of Kabul, the Taliban immediately executed the ISIS-K members kept in the prisons of Kabul.


Third, the prospects of the two groups are opposite. The Afghan Taliban promise to establish an "inclusive" government, and hope to gain national support by protecting women and minorities, while ISIS-K, similar to ISIS, tends to violate the rights of females and repress other religions or ethnic groups, defining any hostile groups as "infedel," or "unfaithful," including the Taliban.


Given all these unbridgeable divisions between the two groups, their conflicts might lead to a major war in Afghanistan in the future.


Editor's note: Wang Jin is a research fellow at Charhar Institute and the Northwest University of China. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.


Author

WANG Jin

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2022 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use