The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03 ,2021
                                                                                  

   

A protester waves a flag during the unrest in Khartoum, Sudan, October 25, 2021. /Reuters


Editor's note: He Wenping is a senior research fellow at the Charhar Institute and China Africa Institute of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The article reflects the author's opinions, and not necessarily the views of CGTN.


In the early morning of October 25, a military takeover took place in Sudan in northeastern Africa. General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, declared a state of emergency, disbanded the Sovereignty Council and the Transitional Government, and removed all governors from their posts. Abdalla Hamdok, prime minister of the transitional government, was once "kidnapped", and several Transitional Government ministers were arrested by the military.


The streets of Khartoum, the capital, were in chaos. Soldiers shot at demonstrators supporting the prime minister of the transitional government. At least seven people were killed and more than 140 others injured in the conflict.   


Political transition failed, "military-civilian co-governance" died halfway


This round of Sudan's political transition process was officially launched after the stepping down in April 2019 of "strongman" Omar al-Bashir, who ruled Sudan for 30 years. Bashir's overthrow was also due to continuous protest marches and sit-in demonstrations by the masses. The increasing pressure eventually forced the military to choose a side, abandon the president who was condemned by the anger and popular grievance, and the military itself embarked on a political course.


But unlike other countries with similar political transition experiences, after Sudan overthrew the long-ruling "strongman" rule, it started transiting to a "military-civilian co-governance," that is, the military invited some civilian officials and "protest groups" to form the "Sovereign Council" at the helm of state power. Under the leadership and supervision of the "Sovereign Council," Sudan established a "transitional government" composed mainly of technocrats, with Hamdok as prime minister.


In the 11-member council, the ratio of military to civilian officials is 6:5, and General Burhan is its president. However, according to the relevant provisions of the Constitutional Declaration, initially accepted by all parties, the presidency was to be held alternately by military and civilian officials, that is, military personnel in the first half and civilian officials in the second half.


According to the provisions, the presidency should be transferred to civilian officials in the fall of this year. However, an army accustomed to holding power does not find it easy to give up such a key position. Since the middle of this year, around the transfer of the presidency of the Sovereign Council, the reorganization of the government, and the distribution of related powers and interests, military personnel and civilian officials have blamed each other, and contradictions have escalated.


Now, the Sudanese military has once again proved that "hard mouth" is not as hard as "gun barrel" by launching a military takeover. The disbandment of the transitional government by the Sudanese military and its own full power front shows that Sudan's "military-civilian co-governance" in the post-Bashir era has died halfway.


   

A street view during unrest in Khartoum, Sudan, October 25, 2021. /Getty


When General Burhan declared the state of emergency, he said that a new government would be formed to lead the political transition process in Sudan. Once the relevant institutions are established, the state of emergency would be canceled. The newly formed government would lead the country until elections in July 2023, when state power would be handed over to a non-military government.


U.S. reacts fiercely and suspends aid to Sudan


During Bashir's rule, due to the Islamization policy adopted and the "unclear and chaotic" relationship between Sudan and Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, the United States not only once put Sudan on its list of "Countries Supporting Terrorism" but also regarded the Bashir regime as "a thorn in the flesh" that must be removed.


After the fall of the Bashir regime, the United States felt the opportunity had come and began to actively intervene in Sudan's post-Bashir political transition process, and supported the transitional government of civilian officials in the name of "promoting democracy" in order to gradually fade the Sudanese military power out of political decision-making circles in Sudan.


On the day before the unrest in Sudan, the U.S. special envoy of the Horn of Africa, Jeffrey Feltman, was still visiting Sudan and held separate meetings with Prime Minister Hamdok of the Transitional Government and chairman of Sudan's Sovereign Council Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan to express U.S. support for Sudan's democratic transition to civil rule. It is reported that Feltman also threatened the Sudanese military at the time, saying that any action to "change the transitional government by force" would "endanger U.S. aid to Sudan."


However, what surprised special envoy Feltman was that neither his meeting nor the "threat" had any effect at all. The U.S. State Department also responded quickly, announcing that the $700 million emergency aid plan provided by the Joe Biden administration to Sudan was completely suspended until a review of the sudden incident was concluded.


The Sudan unrest is the latest on the African continent in recent years after similar chaos in Chad, Mali, and Guinea. In fact, the "resurgence" of military takeovers in Africa is not only a "by-product" of the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on African economic development but also the result of the hard road to progress of immature democracies.


Author

HE Wenping

Adjunct Senior Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2022 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use