The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

US coercion of LatAm over Russia-Ukraine conflict is only asking for a new cold

March 04 ,2022

1.jpg

Photo taken in Arlington, Virginia, the United States, on Feb. 24, 2022 shows a screen displaying U.S. President Joe Biden delivering remarks on Russia and Ukraine in a live stream provided by PBS News. Biden announced on Thursday additional sanctions against Russia and the deployment of more troops to Europe as conflicts in Ukraine continue to evolve. (Photo: Xinhua)

Some Western media outlets and think tanks have been arguing recently that Latin America's response to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine illustrates "the growing strategic challenge to the US from the survival and proliferation of populist authoritarian regimes in the Western Hemisphere." On the one hand, they overstate the "danger" of countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. On the other hand, they highlight Russia's "disinformation campaign and the presence of Russia Today in Spanish-language media."

At the same time, the US is pushing the Organization of American States (OAS) to reach a consensus so that it can separate nations it sanctions, including Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, completely from other Latin American countries. It constantly urges its "allies" to openly take its side regarding the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflicts.

Washington still thinks it can do whatever it wants in Latin America; that it can easily manipulate regional countries to follow its lead and sanction Russia. But the reality is that this isn't happening, no matter how hard Washington tries to rope in these countries. Regional powers, such as Brazil and Mexico, have refused to impose sanctions on Russia.

For most countries in the region, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is happening on the faraway European continent; thus, the issue is not closely related to their interests. They neither have the willingness nor the need to take a clear stance. Yet, the US insists on pressuring them to take a side, which is an action that doesn't conform to the norms of international law. By doing so, Washington is actually interfering in other countries' internal affairs and complicating the situation even more.

Latin American countries have suffered a lot from the US' long-arm jurisdiction for a long time. There is nothing wrong with them making decisions based on their own national interests. But the US doesn't agree with this. From its perspective, not supporting its position is the same as taking Russia's side, and for doing that, there is a price to pay. This is undoubtedly a hegemonic way of thinking that disrespects other nations' sovereignty.

In addition, some Latin American countries' "disobedience" on the issue of whether to impose economic sanctions on Russia demonstrates that they can withstand US pressure and are able to make independent decisions based on their own interests. This indicates that the US' control over Latin America is not as comprehensive as once before, especially when it comes to issues that concern the interests of Latin American nations. The non-Western camp that is subject to the leadership of the US and the West is not as monolithic as Washington thinks.

Some Western media reports highlighted that countries condemning the US and NATO as culprits of the Ukraine crisis are those sanctioned by the US, in an attempt to mislead public opinion into the whirlpool of taking sides. They did so to continue to slander Russia's reasonable concerns against NATO's eastward expansion and to stress the "legitimacy" of the West's sanctions on Russia. The US has been hoping to take advantage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict to maximize its own interests. It aims to force some countries to take sides on the Ukraine issue and form a new post-Cold War international order in which countries of two camps are hostile to each other. The US wants to coerce countries to its side, cornering countries like China, Russia and Cuba into an isolated situation and forming a political and economic atmosphere that is even more unfavorable to nations sanctioned by the US.

The US is taking advantage of the basic principle that Latin American countries generally oppose foreign military presence, in order to arouse Latin America's fear of the Cuba missile crisis as well as the Cold War, hoping that they will rely more on the US in terms of their own defense. The US is also taking this opportunity to create an advantageous atmosphere for a larger US military presence in the region. It is calling for a new "cold war," trying to raise the curtain with sanctions against Russia, but this will eventually be recognized and rejected by all countries.

The author is the executive director of the Latin American and Caribbean Region Law Center of China University of Political Science and Law.


Author

PAN Deng

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2022 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use