The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

Facing challenges, US' IPEF may make the Asia-Pacific economy more...

June 09, 2022

Behind Biden’s Asia Trip

June 09, 2022

US sinks its claws back into Somalia with an eye on China and Russia

May 23, 2022

The Taiwan Question amid Russia-Ukraine Conflict

May 06, 2022

China’s Oil Deal v.s. the Dollar Mar 28, 2022

March 28, 2022

Biden’s Indo-Pacific Foray

February 26, 2022
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Sudan's 'military-civilian co-governance' dies halfway

November 03, 2021

Human rights standards shall not be monopolized

October 14, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

The key to peace between Russia and Ukraine CGTN

March 03, 2022

Biden’s first year marked by lows and challenges

March 03, 2022
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

Is Moon’s Visit To DPRK The Key To Breaking Nuclear Deadlock?

September 19 ,2018

ROK President Moon Jae-in and his wife Kim Jung-sook leave the Presidential Blue House in Seoul, Sept 18, 2018. 


President of the Republic of Korea Moon Jae-in has arrived at the Pyongyang International Airport on Tuesday morning and was received with a grand welcome ceremony led by the leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Kim Jong-un.


The two greeted each other with a hug and then together inspected the guards of honor, with a huge crowd waving flowers in the background, live broadcast at a press center in Seoul showed.


This is the first inter-Korean summit in DPRK’s capital Pyongyang in 11 years.


Moon Jae-in waves as he reviews honour guards with DPRK top leader Kim Jong-un at Pyongyang Sunan International Airport, ahead of their third summit in this still frame taken from video, Sept 18, 2018.


Kim has promised so far this year to abandon the country’s nuclear arms program on three crucial occasions thanks to the joint efforts of the international community. Thus, the situation on the Korean Peninsula is going well.


The first time Kim promised to abandon the DPRK’s nuclear arms program was during the China-DPRK summit in March, the second time was during the summit with the Republic of Korea (ROK) in April, and the third time was during the U.S.-DPRK summit in June.


To demonstrate its sincerity, the DPRK abandoned nuclear test tunnels and then its missile engine test site and launch site. However, after the U.S.-DPRK summit, there has been little progress in talks on nuclear abandonment. U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly called off Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s fourth visit to the DPRK on August 24, which brought the DPRK’s nuclear disarmament process into stranding.


The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the defused military tension between the two Koreas would be on the main dialogue agenda for the summit. Is Moon’s Visit to DPRK the Key to Breaking Nuclear Deadlock?


South Korea’s Alliance Dilemma


As a mediator, the ROK is in a hurry to find a breakthrough for the U.S.-DPRK denuclearization negotiations which are currently deadlocked.


On September 5, the ROK government sent special presidential envoys to Pyongyang to narrow the differences between the DPRK and the U.S. The ROK-DPRK summit, which is to be held on September 18-20, is supposed to promote the denuclearization of the entire Korean Peninsula, which demonstrates ROK’s will in guiding the nuclear situation.


After the end of Cold War, the U.S. refused to normalize its relationship with the DPRK, therefore the nuclear crisis continues till today.


Although the DPRK’s possession of nuclear weapons can threaten U.S. security, the U.S. has used that as a pretext to further control its ROK ally and increase intervention on regional affairs. Accordingly, ROK sovereignty is dwarfed within the framework of the U.S.-ROK alliance, with the partial loss of its independence in decision-making over peaceful reunification.


Once the U.S. and the DPRK establish diplomatic relations, there will be a weakening or even disintegration of the alliance between the ROK and the U.S., which conforms to the ROK’s pursuit of getting rid of U.S. in-depth intervention in its internal affairs, foreign affairs and unity. For the ROK, only if the DPRK gives up its nuclear program will U.S.-ROK relations be rid of its alliance dilemma, allowing the ROK to exert its domestic industrial and technological strengths to dominate the peaceful reunification process.

One of the purposes of ROK President Moon Jae-in’s recent dispatch of special envoys to the DPRK was to ensure that the DPRK will keep its promise of giving up its nuclear program. On that basis, the ROK can further guide the DPRK to continue negotiations with the U.S.


Possible Summit Outcomes


Moon Jae-in meets with Kim Jong-un at the Peace House, a building on the ROK side of Panmunjom on April 27, 2018.


For the DPRK, the abandonment of its nuclear weapons is closely related to its political stability. It has frequently shown signs of abandoning its nuclear program this year, which can ease tension from the international community and lead to international aid. On the other hand, the DPRK’s actions are also based on containing the U.S. strategic offensive and preventing a war crisis.


So far, the alleged abandonment of nuclear weapons remains tactical, because possessing nuclear weapons is not only a requirement in the DPRK Constitution but also the basic line of the Seventh Congress of the Workers Party of Korea. The premise for the DPRK keeping its promise of abandoning its nuclear program is that the U.S. completely abandon its hostile policy toward the country. However, the DPRK knows that the U.S. won’t relinquish that policy easily. In order to reinforce its position in dealing with the U.S., the DPRK needs to have good relations with China and Russia and split the U.S.-ROK alliance by promoting the great unity of the Korean nation.


However, as far as this premise goes, it will be difficult for the ROK-DPRK summit to generate any breakthroughs.

According to the ROK special envoys, during the summit, the two parties will review the fulfillment of the Panmunjom Declaration, determine the direction of future advancement, negotiate the practical scheme for achieving the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and jointly show their determination to achieve peaceful coexistence and common prosperity.


The summit topics may include the following: institutionalizing the political talks and exchanges between the two countries and maintaining cooperation momentum; putting forward concrete measures of improving bilateral relations with the main focus on strengthening exchanges and cooperation in the humanitarian field; discussing specific schemes on how to build mutual trust and prevent armed conflict, such as adopting unarmed measures and laying down arms along the Military Demarcation Line and Yellow Sea (Korea calls it the West Sea).

It should not be ruled out that Moon will promise to lift some of the unilateral sanctions against the DPRK to win its trust and restore tourism in the Kumgang Mountain resort area and Kaesong. In addition, the two countries have to reach a new consensus on a denuclearization declaration and an end of war declaration.

Meanwhile, Kim’s return visit to Seoul may be included in the declaration issued during the summit.


Abandonment of North Korean Nuclear Program is Key


Before the settlement of the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula, the ROK is incapable of changing the cruel reality that the ROK-DPRK relationship is subordinated to U.S.-DPRK relations and that the U.S.-ROK alliance is short-term. Moon said, "only after we achieve the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and peaceful reunification can we attain real economic cooperation with the outside world."




There is a clear contradiction between the U.S. and the ROK in promoting an end of war declaration: the ROK hopes to guide the DPRK to abandoning its nuclear weapons through issuing a cooperation blueprint with an end of war declaration. However, the U.S. insists that it will only start negotiations on the agenda concerning the peace issue after the DPRK has declared its abandonment of its nuclear program and finalized the timetable for giving it up. Therefore, U.S. actions are intertwined with the ROK’s unilateral cooperation policies with the DPRK.

Due to the stalled talks, the U.S. government seems to have lost its patience, thus its policy of exerting extreme pressure on the DPRK and its joint military drills with the ROK are picking up. If the DPRK adopts opportunist strategies in abandoning its nuclear program, it will result in more geopolitical challenges to it and other countries in Northeast Asia.

First, the DPRK won’t get any foreign economic cooperation opportunities and it will remain isolated. Second, there will be more anti-Moon sentiment in the ROK, leading to the weakening of an already record low U.S.-ROK alliance. Third, constantly burdened by the nuclear power in the DPRK, China will be unable to maintain a solid cooperation foundation with the DPRK. Fourth, it may provide a reason for the U.S. to address the Korean nuclear issue through military force.

Therefore, even if the third ROK-DPRK summit is held, Korean Peninsula peace still remains uncertain if the DPRK doesn’t provide a specific plan for the abandonment of its nuclear arms program. If it doesn’t, Moon’s administration can’t guide or mediate a settlement of the Korean nuclear issue. Instead, its reconciliation policy toward the DPRK will have to change under both domestic and foreign pressure, which will lead to more variations in ROK-DPRK relations.



Copy Editor: Liang Chenglu

Editor: Kang Sijun


Author: Liang Lichang is researcher of Chahar Institute.

Source: China Focus

Original Link: http://www.cnfocus.com/is-moon-s-visit-to-dprk-the-key-to-breaking-nuclear-deadlock/


Author

LIANG Lichang

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2023 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use