The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Our Organization
    • About GMF
      The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan.

    Transatlantic Offices

    • Washington, DC
    • Ankara
    • Belgrade
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Bucharest
    • Paris
    • Warsaw
    • Alliance for Securing Democracy
  • Our Work
    • Policy
      GMF provides effective ways forward to solving today’s transatlantic policy issues.
    • Leadership
      GMF programs offer rising leaders dynamic opportunities to hone their leadership skills.
    • Civil Society
      GMF supports civil society by fostering democratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation.
    • Research
      GMF publications examine the challenges facing the transatlantic region today and offer policy recommendations to address these challenges.
    • Perspectives
      Media, blogs, podcasts, video on the issues shaping the transatlantic relationship.
  • Our Events
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    • Recent & Upcoming Events
      GMF is committed to bringing the policy community together around transatlantic topics. Learn about events in its offices and other locations around the world.
  • Our Experts
  • Stay Informed
Search
Home
  • Our Experts
  • ABOUT US
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

The Charhar Institute

  • About Us

    • About Us
    • Founding Chairman
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Support Charhar
  • Regions

    • All Regions
    • America
    • Europe&Middle East
    • Asia
    • Africa&Latin America
    • Indo-Pacific
  • Topics

    • All Topics
    • Public Diplomacy and International Relations
    • Belt & Road Initiative
    • The Korean Peninsula
    • Economic and Trade
    • Communication
    • Law, Culture and Religion
    • Energy, Safety and Peace
  • Experts

  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • Public Dipmacy Quarterly
    • Other books and reports
    • Charhar Public Diplomacy series
    • Charhar Newsletter
    • Charhar International Relations series
    • Introduction to Public Diplomacy
  • News&Events

    • News&Events
    • Public Diplomacy
    • Peace Studies
    • Belt & Road
    • Charhar News
    • Announcement
    • For Media
Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
ForeignAffairs.com
  • ABOUT US
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • FOUNDING CHAIRMAN
  • EXPERTS
  • LATEST RESEARCH
  • NEWS&EVENTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • SUPPORT CHARHAR

NEWS&EVENTS

The China-Canada Online Forum was Successfully Held

January 25, 2021

Canadian Ambassador to China Dominic Barton visited the Charhar Institute

November 26, 2020

More Chinese relief materials sent to South Korea

March 06, 2020

Chinese NGO donates epidemic prevention materials to S. Korea

March 05, 2020

Han Fangming gives a send-off to Nepalese Ambassador Leela Mani Paudyal

March 05, 2020

Singapore’s new ambassador Lui Tuck Yew visits The Charhar Institute

January 16, 2020
More

Energy, Safety and Peace

Impact of ‘Trumpism’ on US constitutionalism, democracy dies hard

January 13, 2021

How will Biden confront Trump's foreign policy legacy?

January 13, 2021

Law, Culture and Religion

Israel's diplomatic breakthrough in Maghreb faces challenges

December 11, 2020

Meng ruling makes Ottawa new front line between Washington and Beijing

May 29, 2020

Communication

He Wenping: Fake news fails in damaging Sino-African ties

January 31, 2019

Resistance from within the White House

September 10, 2018

Economic and Trade

Challenges for the G20 in overcoming the pandemic

November 26, 2020

Liberalization and non-interference by government will clean up Pakistan'...

July 07, 2020

The Korean Peninsula

Su Hao: Tokyo should give ground to resolve tensions with Seoul over ‘comfo...

June 26, 2019

Swaran Singh: Can next U.S.-DPRK meeting be expected?

June 12, 2019

Belt & Road Initiative

China-Africa unity sees friendship of new era

January 05, 2021

Unchangeable Commitment

February 19, 2020

Public Diplomacy and International Relations

Morrison's misjudgment on China-Australia relations

December 11, 2020

Travesty to tarnish normal defense moves as wolf warrior diplomacy

December 10, 2020
More

Introduction to Public Diplomacy

Diplomatic Theory and Practice

June 21, 2018

Introduction to Public Diplomacy 2nd Edition

June 20, 2018

Charhar International Relations series

International Public Product: China and the World at the Midst of Revolut...

June 21, 2018

Power and Wealth: Economic Nationalism and International Relationships und...

June 21, 2018

Charhar Newsletter

Charhar Newsletter

August 16, 2018

Charhar Public Diplomacy series

Winning the Chinese Hearts and Souls

June 20, 2018

City Diplomacy: China’s Practice and Foreign Experience

June 20, 2018

Other books and reports

The impotence of conventional arms control

March 25, 2020

How Did Stalin Fall into the “Thucydides Trap”

February 27, 2020

Public Dipmacy Quarterly

Public Diplomacy Quarterly

August 17, 2018
More

U.S. double standards on national security shoot itself in the foot

May 28 ,2020

The third session of the 13th National People's Congress opens at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, May 22, 2020. /Xinhua

The third session of the 13th National People's Congress is deliberating a draft decision on establishing and improving the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) to safeguard national security to plug the loopholes in the HKSAR's legal system regarding national security.

However, it's quite baffling that some American politicians have issued a barrage of vitriolic comments on the standard legislative practice within the scope of China's sovereignty. Their ignorance and arrogance are thinly veiled, which compels us to return the "favor" by citing a case that once shocked them to the core.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was hunted down and persecuted by the U.S. government for disclosing numerous top-secret documents describing U.S. military crimes in Iraq.

The U.S. government nudged Sweden to launch a rape investigation against Assange. Later on, it put pressure on Britain to extradite Assange. After hiding in the Ecuadorian Embassy to the United Kingdom for years, Assange was arrested and detained by the British police whose hands were obviously forced by the United States. in April 2019. The imprisonment put Assange in a perilous state. Facing the double whammy of the raging pandemic and his pre-existing health conditions, Assange's life is at stake.

It's known to the public that it was Assange who revealed the scandal of the U.S. military. However, WikiLeaks didn't hack its way to acquire these documents. Instead, they were actually provided by a disenchanted American soldier who once worked at a sensitive department.

The revelation was particularly important for the American people in terms of their right to know. Therefore, it's in the best interests of the American people.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange delivers a speech from the balcony of Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Britain, December 20, 2012. /Xinhua

Unfortunately, since the U.S. government claimed that this move jeopardized national security, even Australia, Assange's home country, gave up the idea of saying a fair word for Assange. The biggest reason why most countries choose to remain reticent is that they hope someday when a similar thing happens to them, the U.S. can respect their acts of defending national interests the way they do to respect America's defense of its national security.

In fact, there is a basic consensus around the principle of international law that national security is an interest inherent to national sovereignty and serves as the very basis for the existence of a sovereign state. Maintaining national security is an integral part of the time-honored Westphalian order as well as a mandate granted to countries by the UN Charter. In its pursuit of an innocent information provider in the name of national security, the U.S. surprisingly got some cooperation from other countries. In a sense, these countries under the Westphalian system have been acting to uphold the common standards relating to national security under international law.

But some caveats should be in place. As is criticized in "Gore Vidal: History of the National Security State," the desire to control which derives from the "imperial presidency" in the United States has evolved into arrogance undermining and distorting international common rules. When other countries exercise their rights to national security within the scope of national sovereignty and build a responsible legal system with completely lawful behaviors and impeccable reasons, the United States adopted another standard to attack this legitimate behavior. The logic, albeit twisted, is clear: as long as the U.S. is not happy if the same Assange incident occurred in other countries, the same actions taken by them would amount to a violation of the freedom of speech and the public's right to know rather than a defense of national security interests.

No wonder the same anti-separatist principles enshrined in the U.S. Civil War would lead to a completely different interpretation if transplanted to other countries. The U.S. would insist that they are not principles to protect national security but an act that jeopardizes freedom, hence threatening the countries in concern with unilateral sanctions. Such double-standard policies not only consume the U.S.' credibility in the international community but also speak volumes about its betrayal of the Westphalian order. Bit by bit, the U.S. is peeling away its global leadership it took centuries to build.


Source: CGTN, 27-May-2020

Author

HE Jingjun

Adjunct Fellow

Stay Informed

Don't miss our latest dynamic. Sign up to receive emailed news, events, opinion, and publication notifications.

Subscribe

Follow

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • SoundCloud
  • Instagram
Charhar Institute
  • About Us
  • Founding Chairman
  • Experts
  • Latest Research
  • News&Events
  • Publications
  • Support Charhar
  • Careers

 

"The Charhar Institute is committed to promoting progress in China’s foreign policies and the development of international relations in a more orderly manner."
- Dr Han Fangming,Charhar Chairman

CONTACT US

  • Phone:+86 10 68290431
  • Fax:010-80777830
  • Email:secretariat@charhar.org.cn
  • Facebook:The Charhar Institute
  • Twitter:@CharharINST

©2021 Charhar Institute. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use